. . . .
The Humanist Online A Magazine of Critical Inquiry and Social Concern .
Subscribe  |  Archive  |  Advertise  |  Write for Us  |  About Us
. .
.
.
Essay Contest
Our annual contest is open to those ages 13 to 25. Enter your essay and win cash prizes!
Published by the:
American Humanist Association

The Humanist

July/August 2000

Volume 60, Number 4


Cover Story:

Kent State—Thirty Years Later:
What We're Still Fightin' For

by Mac Lojowsky

This past May, at Kent State University, the thirtieth anniversary of the National Guard shootings of Vietnam War protesters in 1970 was commemorated with a rally that showed the student movement in the United States is alive and well. Meanwhile, the mainstream media's sensationalist and hostile coverage of only one of the nineteen leading activists who were on the commemoration program—death row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal (whose words were prerecorded)—made it clear that "objective" news reporters and editors continue to advance an establishment agenda.


Articles:

A Humane Death Sentence?

by Mary Frances Robinson

How humane, really, are today's methods of execution? Is lethal injection truly painless? What about the preparation process leading to it? And what about life on death row? An advocate for incarcerated women examines the recent execution of Bettie Lou Beets, thus providing a clearer picture of what really goes on behind prison walls.

Selling Serenity

by Andrew Meacham

A former editor at a leading self-help publication shows how sincere efforts to guide and aid the troubled can easily become entangled with exploitative and dangerous fads. As a result, a healthy skepticism should be the first guidepost on the road to recovery.

No, Virginia, Abortion is NOT Genocide

by Joyce Arthur

Can abortion really be compared to genocide? And do those who say so actually believe and act on their words? In this article, a pro-choice activist fills a serious gap in the current debate by carefully dissecting the abortion-as-genocide rhetoric and exposing its fallacies and inconsistencies. Also critiqued are the tactics of the leading anti-abortion porponents who use this argument.

The Evolution of Moral Values

by John M. Chrisman

When we ask, "How can we know right from wrong?", we are asking the wrong question. Right and wrong aren't static things leading to unchanging rules applicable in all cases. They are evolving ideas that we grow into as we test and develop them over the centuries in ever-changing societies and situations.


Features:

Letters to the Editor

Up Front

Creative Controversy

Watch on the Right

The Skeptical Eye

Environmental Watch

Humanistic Economics

Book Reviews

First Person

.